|
Re: Evolution, "adaptation", and what's currently adaptiveLen Piotrowski (lpiotrow@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu)Wed, 4 Sep 1996 14:00:05 GMT
In article <504n6q$qjs@argo.unm.edu> mycol1@unm.edu (Bryant) writes:
>[snip]
>OK-doke. I would like to see a reference someday (from anybody)
It's a central problem to your thesis of a functional adaptationist
>>>The neuropeptide causing
>I will respond at length, and carefully, after my approaching phys class.Ok?
The central problem I am interested in is the relationship between a
>>>That neuropeptide is a "physical object" by your accounting, yes?
>Lenny, unless organic chemistry is an exercise in metaphysics,
Unless I become an organic chemist, I'll have to take your word for it, capice?
Cheers,
--Lenny__
|