Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?
Roelof Ruules (ruules@fys.ruu.nl)
Tue, 12 Sep 1995 11:56:54 GMT
In <DErsuo.1K9@crash.cts.com> roosen@crash.cts.com (Robert Roosen) writes:
>Check the URLs on the debunkers. The majority of them are being paid by
>branches of the Military/Industrial Complex. They are blind to truth
>because of this. In the US this phenomenon is called "conflict of interest".
I don't live in the US and I'm most certainly not being paid by the
M/IC. I think the words you are looking for are "conflict of
understanding". There is a big difference between "trying to understand
something" and "shouting out nonsense as loud as you can, while not
listening to anyone else".
> btw, the key is the lack of humor they show while "defending"
>something they do not understand.
Speak for yourself ;)
BTW If I'm on some military list, it's probably because I'm a
conscientious objector, and headed some conshie organisation for some
time. I don't like the military. I don't like dumping nuclear wastes.
And I don't like people talking s... about something they clearly don't
understand. I'm willing to adjust my opinions, which I think is the
basis of all science. But only when I hear sound reasons, not when
someone is shouting it out.
Roelof
|