Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Roger M. Wilcox: "Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?"
• Previous message: JOSEPH CHRISTOPHER HILL: "Attention Flint Knappers"

In article <AC6BED2E96687E9D@cara.demon.co.uk> peter@cara.demon.co.uk (Peter Ceresole) writes:
>
>The anomalies and complications are *so* complicated that news editors only
>run them after they have heard some kind of explanation like Inflation (is
>inflation still necessary these days?).

Only if the Federal Reserve keeps up its policy of "loaning" money into
existence through the banks. :-)

-- 

tracer@best.com (Jeff Boeing) - FORMERLY - rogerw@cisco.com (Roger M. Wilcox)

----------------- I'm not flying fast, just orbiting low ---------------------

MSTie #38808 | "I'm trying to remember -- there were an awful lot of

             | casualties that day." -- Kup, _The Transformers: The Movie_

• Next message: Roger M. Wilcox: "Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?"
• Previous message: JOSEPH CHRISTOPHER HILL: "Attention Flint Knappers"