Re: No Anthropology here

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Mary Beth Williams: "Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?"
• Previous message: Andrew Cooke: "Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?"
• Maybe in reply to: dfrederick1@vaxa.hofstra.edu: "No Anthropology here"
• Next in thread: Cameron Laird: "Re: No Anthropology here"

dfrederick1@vaxa.hofstra.edu wrote:
>I have spent many years studying anthropology. It was my understanding that anthropology was the unbiased study of cultures. What=
is this garbage that you people are talking about under the guise of anthropology.
>
>Are there any scholars here?
>Incredible
>
Hi there.
Just signed onto this group. I have a B.A. in Anthropology, and am
thinking about going for a Masters. I agree that so far I have seen
little that reminds me of what I have studied. However, I would
softly remind you that no science is absolutely unbiased. Every
being who views an entity must interperate that vision through her/his
own eyes and mind. What is stupid to one is not, to another.
Anthropology is a fascinating course of study! Carry on!

• Next message: Mary Beth Williams: "Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?"
• Previous message: Andrew Cooke: "Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?"
• Maybe in reply to: dfrederick1@vaxa.hofstra.edu: "No Anthropology here"
• Next in thread: Cameron Laird: "Re: No Anthropology here"