Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Murray Zenk: "Re: BOSNIA"
• Previous message: Martin Callingham: "Re: No Anthropology here"

In article <DE9Ioz.4q6@crash.cts.com>,
roosen@crash.cts.com (Robert Roosen) wrote:
>
> Correct. The H-bomb calculations are quite similar to the Big
>Bang stuff. Funding for both areas of study comes from the same place.

This is nonsense. It is perilously close to simply being a lie.

--

Carl Fink       carlf@panix.com      madscientist@genie.com

Assistant Sysop, GEnie's First and Fourth Science Fiction RoundTables

The SFRT page has moved AGAIN, to http://www.sfrt.com/sfrt1

• Next message: Murray Zenk: "Re: BOSNIA"
• Previous message: Martin Callingham: "Re: No Anthropology here"