|
|
Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?
Erik Max Francis (max@alcyone.darkside.com)
Tue, 29 Aug 95 11:42:05 PDT
elwest@Teleport.com (Wesley Taylor) writes:
> You might try to read outside astronomy a little. Hannes Alfvens work in
> Plasma Physics has done some real damage to Big Bang. The BB theory is NOT
> almost universally accepted. There are some steady staters left and a whole
> new crop of plasma cosmology theorists. Try Lerners "The Big Bang Never
> Happened " as a start. He gives an excellent descripton of teh alternates
> and the problems in publishing challenges to big bang.
No, the big bang _is_ still almost universally accepted, despite a few
groups waiting in the wings. Despite what others would have you believe,
the big bang still is by far and away the best cosmological model we
have.
Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE // uuwest!alcyone!max, max@alcyone.darkside.com
San Jose, CA, USA // 37 20 07 N 121 53 38 W // GIGO, Omega, Psi // the 4th R!
H.3`S,3,P,3$S,#$Q,C`Q,3,P,3$S,#$Q,3`Q,3,P,C$Q,#(Q.#`-"C`- // 1love // folasade
_Omnia quia sunt, lumina sunt._ // mc2? oo? Nah. // http://www.spies.com/max/
|