Re: terms

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: John Wilkins: "Re: Further Evolution beyond the Human?"
• Previous message: socrates: "Re: Further Evolution beyond the Human?"

>
> and "libertarian", however, are clear and cogent. And telling. They place you, girlie, in a camp way away from human
> : understanding, in a world of gobbledigook, geists, spooks and Jewish
> : sleight-of-hand. That you take yourself seriously is beyond belief.
> : Get yourself OUT of this NG which is about politics.
>
> I'd be happy to. Which newsgroup is yours? Can you prove it? This is
> rather wildly crossposted, you know. Okay, so you're new on Usent. You'll
> make a lot of antisemitic friends. The other ones, you should just
> killfile (one of these devious Jewish techniques, but we don't mind
> sharing).
>
> Silke
>
> : Albert

Since neither my original or reply post nor her post mentioned
anything whatsoever about anything "Jewish", unless you think Freud made
psychology so because he was and so it ought to be implicit, I fail
utterly to see the relevance of the remark.
I ignored it from Albert, as merely part of a ramble, but here she
is, taking it seriously. Curious.

-- 

  "Truth is mighty and will prevail."

• Next message: John Wilkins: "Re: Further Evolution beyond the Human?"
• Previous message: socrates: "Re: Further Evolution beyond the Human?"