Re: Male Virginity EXPLANATION

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Cameron Laird: "What's the abstract class? (was: WWW pet peeves)"
• Previous message: Michael Nakis : "Re: Male Virginity and Circumcision"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Nakis : "Male Virginity EXPLANATION"
• Next in thread: Hong Ooi: "Re: Male Virginity EXPLANATION"

Distribution:

David Stites (dstites@ncia.com) wrote:
> This type of censorship is against the spirit of USENET. If you don't
> like it don't read it.

Yes.
You are right.
[Head hung in shame.]

I don't know what came over me.

In fact, JTLYK I've conversed with the author
of the thread in question, and we both agree
that I acted irrationally and without due
concern for everyone else's feelings.

I won't appologize; however, but I am sorry.

--:/e--'/o7\=\
"You're not a straight edge, Roske. Your as crooked as the rest of us."
--A friend.

• Next message: Cameron Laird: "What's the abstract class? (was: WWW pet peeves)"
• Previous message: Michael Nakis : "Re: Male Virginity and Circumcision"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Nakis : "Male Virginity EXPLANATION"
• Next in thread: Hong Ooi: "Re: Male Virginity EXPLANATION"