Re: Male Virginity EXPLANATION

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: WebMaster: "Amazing Environmental Organization WebDirectory! http://www.webdirectory.com"
• Previous message: Geoff Bradshaw: "AAA Lodging -- DC"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Nakis : "Male Virginity EXPLANATION"
• Next in thread: David Stites: "Re: Male Virginity EXPLANATION"

[snip]> Theories/hypotheses, to be scientific, must be
>potentially falsifiable. That is why matters such as the existance
>or nonexistance of deities are not in the scientific domain - neither
>side can be shown to be false. There is in science something beyond
>educated guesswork.
>
>That having been said, how is your explanation of circumcision
falsifiable?
>
>-Pat Crowe, SUNY at Buffalo
>
>

Well, if I can manage to defend my positions so well as to make them
invulnerable to falsification, I will consider myself to have done pretty
well! Once I have reached that point, I might then top it off by
introducing some falsifiable element so as to satisfy people like you.

:-)

• Next message: WebMaster: "Amazing Environmental Organization WebDirectory! http://www.webdirectory.com"
• Previous message: Geoff Bradshaw: "AAA Lodging -- DC"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Nakis : "Male Virginity EXPLANATION"
• Next in thread: David Stites: "Re: Male Virginity EXPLANATION"