Re: Metric Time (was Re: Why not 13 months? (Was La Systeme Metrique))
Victor Gordon (Victor.Gordon@unsw.edu.au)
18 Oct 1995 23:20:44 GMT
In article <45u1u2$m6g@news.halcyon.com>,
Rusty Rae <Rustyra@!Halcyon.com> wrote:
>fc3a501@mathsem1.math.uni-hamburg.de (Hauke Reddmann) wrote:
>>Rusty Rae (Rustyra@!Halcyon.com) wrote:
>>: . . .And this has ______ to do with astrology?
>>: Sheila
>>(insignificant rhubarb deleted)
>>Easy. It's insignificant rhubarb. Just like astrology. :-)
>>Hauke Reddmann fc3a501@math.uni-hamburg.de
>><:-EX8
> I see, so if you think something is insignificant you abuse it.
>For instance, you see astrology as insignificant, therefore you post
>whatever you think of first, whether or not it has anything to do with
>anything.
> Rhubarb is insignificant, what else, Hauke? What else do you abuse?
>Women, children, alcohol, drugs? You have an abusive profile so far.
> Sheila
Am I missing a particularly subtle piece of logic here?
Hauke thinks astrology is insignificant, therefore he is:
- An abuser of women and children
- A user of drugs and alcohol.
Frankly, most of the people I know who take astrology seriously take a
lot more drugs than the people I know who don't take astrology seriously.
What's the star sign for a sense of humour and proportion?
Victor
Victor.Gordon@unsw.edu.au
|