Re: What Would Happen If the Academic Bureaucracy Levelled With

Jack Henry (JHenry@Mail.sal.ksu.edu)
25 Nov 1996 07:27:03 GMT

I do not believe in this bull shit.

In article <cgage-2411961806160001@s203.haverford.edu>, cgage@haverford.edu
says...
>
>In article <3298A3ED.2FD1@conterra.com>, bwhit@conterra.com wrote:
>
>> Toby Cockcroft wrote:
>> >
>> > In article <329500CA.1E3E@conterra.com>, bwhit@conterra.com wrote:
>> >
>> > >Real Name . wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi,
>> > >> I agreed with you completely, assuming you were talking politics.
>> > >> But evolution is simply not open to challenge by honest people.
>> > >> Just take the time to study the plum tree.
>> > >> Just take the time to go out to a dinosaur site.
>> > >> Ken.
>> >
>> > > I agree with yo on evolution. But someone who agrees with us
>doesnot
>> > >belive in evolution. That's fine with us, since we are not Politically
>> > >Correct clones, so disagreement is expected.
>> >
>> > Wron again Bob. My you are a foolish little child aren't you ... yes you
>> > are. I disagree with you constantly yet I beleive in the theory of
>> > evolution. What you beleive in isn't evolution it is social Darwinism.
>> > If you don't know the difference why don't you try going back to school.
>> >
>> > Toby
>>
>>
>> All you've proven is that you don't know what not being a clone
>> means.
>
>You're probably right about that...how is anyone to know what a "clone" is
>when you use it to describe people whom you place in a category that you
>refuse to define?