Re: Paki gets his turban in a spin

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Phillip E Werst: "Re: Paki gets his turban in a spin"
• Previous message: Bill Burnett: "Re: ``With a MOO-MOO here and a QUACK-QUACK there . . .''"
• Maybe in reply to: : "Paki gets his turban in a spin"
• Next in thread: Phillip E Werst: "Re: Paki gets his turban in a spin"

In article <garry-2111962254590001@bar-nett.demon.co.uk>,
garry@bar-nett.demon.co.uk (Daniel Barnett) wrote:

|>In article <848569679snz@drmac.demon.co.uk>, Duncan@drmac.demon.co.uk wrote:
|>
|>Has anyone complained to this guy's network (Demon?)

Why? Because he's an idiotic nutter? Dunky's something of an institution
around these parts - you can always rely on him to post a feeble attempt
at flame bait, and laugh as it falls flat on its face. He's the Bernard
Manning of Usenet, he thinks he's funny but, in reality, he's just a sad
pathetic figure looking for attention. Why pander to his "martyr" complex
by complaining to his ISP? That's exactly what he wants.

Read Fatima Ibrahim Al-Shirawi's rather entertaining rebuttal. That's
exactly how he should be dealt with.

• Next message: Phillip E Werst: "Re: Paki gets his turban in a spin"
• Previous message: Bill Burnett: "Re: ``With a MOO-MOO here and a QUACK-QUACK there . . .''"
• Maybe in reply to: : "Paki gets his turban in a spin"
• Next in thread: Phillip E Werst: "Re: Paki gets his turban in a spin"