Re: What Are the Race Deniers Denying?
gkeyes6988@aol.com
15 Nov 1996 20:48:09 GMT
> I'm sorry, but it seems to me that the only place I've heard "PC" is
from
> you. What is the "it" that "not a damned bit of ever WORKS"? Instead of
> talking in generalized fad acronyms why don't you talk about what you
> think composes the so-called "PC" ideas or better yet, specifically what
> you think is not working and what you think would work instead?
> :)
> Cynthia
Bob Whitaker replies:
. Sorry, I can't give you an indstant education. And they obviuously
.arent' doing that in the academic bureaucracy either.
He doesn't want to tell you because he doesn't know. Or more
specifically, he wants to be able to call anything he wants a product of
PC so he can dismiss it without providing a logical reason -- or for that
matter, knowing anything about the topic being debated. Undefined axioms
and "poisoning the well" are two tricks of argumentation that even
pre-schoolers know. He would be more honest if he just called it DWB --
Disagrees With Bob. If you substitute DWB for PC in all of his posts they
become more coherent but not more reasonable.
Stay tuned for a post in which Bob calls this a typical PC response (yeah,
I know, but I can poison the well, too -- though with better logical
cause, since this is Bob's response to more or less everything).
--Greg Keyes
|