Re: Male Virginity EXPLANATION

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: ljcdal@ac.dal.ca: "Origin of circumcision"
• Previous message: Nathan Keir Edel: "Re: Male Virginity EXPLANATION"

In article <1995Oct31.151137.1@bcvms.bc.edu>,
Sean Smith <smthsen@bcvms.bc.edu> wrote:
>In article <472bmc$3pu@kettle.magna.com.au>, hong@magna.com.au (Hong
Ooi) writes:
>>>: This type of censorship is against the spirit of USENET. If you don't
>>>: like it don't read it.
>>>Die, stupid David.
>>>Die.
>>>Die.
>>>Die.
>>
>> Alt, Swedish chef.
>> Bork.
>> Bork.
>> Bork.
>
>She loves you,
>Yeah.
>Yeah.
>Yeah.

I was wondering about the subject header for this thread, but you're
right. This thread does illustrate why so many guys are still virgins.

Michael Straight would *never* tell someone to log out and get a w^Hlife.
FLEOEVDETYHOEUPROEONREWMEILECSOFMOERSGTIRVAENRGEEARDSTVHIESBIITBTLHEEPSRIACYK
Ethical Mirth Gas/"I'm chaste alright."/Magic Hitler Hats/"Hath grace limits?"
"Tight Camel Hairs!"/Chili Hamster Tag/The Gilt Charisma/"I gather this calm."

• Next message: ljcdal@ac.dal.ca: "Origin of circumcision"
• Previous message: Nathan Keir Edel: "Re: Male Virginity EXPLANATION"