|
|
Re: Male Virginity EXPLANATION
ljcdal@ac.dal.ca
28 Oct 95 04:01:24 -0300
In article <46bjg0$544@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>, nakis@ix.netcom.com (Michael Nakis ) writes:
>
> [snip]> Theories/hypotheses, to be scientific, must be
>>potentially falsifiable. That is why matters such as the existance
>>or nonexistance of deities are not in the scientific domain - neither
>>side can be shown to be false. There is in science something beyond
>>educated guesswork.
>>
>>That having been said, how is your explanation of circumcision
> falsifiable?
>>
>>-Pat Crowe, SUNY at Buffalo
>>
>>
>
> Well, if I can manage to defend my positions so well as to make them
> invulnerable to falsification, I will consider myself to have done pretty
> well! Once I have reached that point, I might then top it off by
> introducing some falsifiable element so as to satisfy people like you.
>
> :-)
>
So far, you are stuck in the realm of mythology
LC
|