Re: Gender differences

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Bterr: "Re: ecological anthropology: request"
• Previous message: Gil Hardwick: "Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory""
• Maybe in reply to: ann.nunn@sstar.com: "Gender differences"
• Next in thread: Bryant: "Re: Gender differences"

In <3piummINNsrt@hpsdlmc1.sdd.hp.com> geroldf@sdd.hp.com (Gerold Firl)
writes:
>
>>God knows what would
>>happen if I started asking about *neurological* sexual dimorphisms in
>>humans!
>
>Already proven, although probably not over the full racial spectrum.
>Scientific american presented some of the latest results about a year
ago.
>Clear differences were shown between male and female cognitive
processes.
>

I would be very careful to use the term *already proven* for a
hypothesis which is still very controversial.. I'm not saying I agree
or disagree myself, but only point out the fact that this idea is still
debated widely (particularly if anyone here followed the intense debate
on Arch-L earlier this year...)

MB Williams
Wesleyan

• Next message: Bterr: "Re: ecological anthropology: request"
• Previous message: Gil Hardwick: "Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory""
• Maybe in reply to: ann.nunn@sstar.com: "Gender differences"
• Next in thread: Bryant: "Re: Gender differences"