Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Gil Hardwick: "These continuing x-posts (Re: Evidence . . ."
• Previous message: Gil Hardwick: "Re: Gender differences"

In article <D93G7M.JFn@crash.cts.com>, Robert Roosen (roosen@crash.cts.com) writes:
>
> Does evolution occur only on the earth? Could it be that we are
>seeing the history of the evolution of galaxies as we look back in time?
>Or, the old chestnut, the evolution of physical laws with time.
> Also, these galaxies are more "alive" than physicists can credit
>them with being. For instance, M87 is considered to be a "cannibal
>galaxy". It contains several undigested smaller galaxies. Now this
>sounds like life to me.

Now why would you be wanting to cross post all this science fiction
bullshit so widely all over again, "Dr" Roosen?

What are you hoping to gain by doing so?

None of this nonsense is of any relevance to anthropology in any way
whatsoever, and I can only suppose that you include us in your cross
posts merely to amuse yourself watching everyone else out here weary
of your continuing stupidity.

JUST GET THE FUCK OFF, EH?

• Next message: Gil Hardwick: "These continuing x-posts (Re: Evidence . . ."
• Previous message: Gil Hardwick: "Re: Gender differences"