Re: Gender differences

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Gil Hardwick: "Re: Gender differences"
• Previous message: Christine Malcom: "Re: Gender differences"
• Maybe in reply to: ann.nunn@sstar.com: "Gender differences"
• Next in thread: Gil Hardwick: "Re: Gender differences"

In article <3pvuh8$kvf@triton.unm.edu>, Bryant (mycol1@unm.edu) writes:
>Um, you've described every part of the phenotype. Every single trait is
>the result of the interaction of genes with the developmental environment.
>Care to qualify or clarify a bit?

Um, seems you have as usual neglected to mention the extent to which
the interraction of "the genes" with "the environment" is mediated
by _the person_ the whole assembly of genetic material represents.

How about you just put the PEOPLE back into the picture, Bryant old
fruits, if you want to be taken seriously here on sci.anthropology.

If on the other hand you want to persist in your mumbling burble on
all those little genes, why, sci.biology is over thataway.

Yes?

• Next message: Gil Hardwick: "Re: Gender differences"
• Previous message: Christine Malcom: "Re: Gender differences"
• Maybe in reply to: ann.nunn@sstar.com: "Gender differences"
• Next in thread: Gil Hardwick: "Re: Gender differences"