|
|
Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"
Carl J Lydick (carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU)
22 May 1995 09:17:53 GMT
In article <895@landmark.iinet.net.au>, gil@landmark.iinet.net.au (Gil Hardwick) writes:
=
=In article <5m2xJJOEcsB@khms.westfalen.de>, Kai Henningsen (kai@khms.westfalen.de) writes:
=>The scenario I'm speaking of is someone claiming "here, X was caused by
=>God", or even "whenever you do Z, God does Y", with X and Z observable and
=>examinable phenomena. That's something science can look at, and come to
=>conclusions.
=
=Nonsense to you too, kraut!
=
=Who is this "someone" you are referring to here? It is nobody at all,
=is it, I dare suggest.
Why, fundamentalist morons like you, Gil. It's an article of faith among most
fundies that God intervenes on a regular basis.
So now what we've got it a fundamentalist moron who tries to deny the
existence of his religion in order to prove that his religion is valid!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl J Lydick | INTERnet: CARL@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU | NSI/HEPnet: SOL1::CARL
Disclaimer: Hey, I understand VAXen and VMS. That's what I get paid for. My
understanding of astronomy is purely at the amateur level (or below). So
unless what I'm saying is directly related to VAX/VMS, don't hold me or my
organization responsible for it. If it IS related to VAX/VMS, you can try to
hold me responsible for it, but my organization had nothing to do with it.
|