Re: A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . .

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: JOHN RICE COLE: "NSF soc & behav science directorate eliminated!!"
• Previous message: Gary Lorman: "Re: Sun-Centered? (was: The Flat Earth?)"
• Maybe in reply to: Gil Hardwick: "A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . ."
• Next in thread: Robin Roberts: "Re: A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . ."

In article <832@landmark.iinet.net.au>,
Gil Hardwick <gil@landmark.iinet.net.au> wrote:
>No conspiracy! It's nothing that simplistic indeed. It's all just part
>of your Patriotic Amurkun Complex, ain't that so!

Yeah, that's closer to it... that and personal idiosyncracy, too
much time on the hands, and of course the ever-popular closed-mindedness.

I should also point out that the Hoover Institute is named after
Herbert Hoover (whom you might find not to be such a bad guy) rather
than J. Edgar.

Todd Michel McComb
mccomb@best.com http://www.best.com/~mccomb/home.html

• Next message: JOHN RICE COLE: "NSF soc & behav science directorate eliminated!!"
• Previous message: Gary Lorman: "Re: Sun-Centered? (was: The Flat Earth?)"
• Maybe in reply to: Gil Hardwick: "A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . ."
• Next in thread: Robin Roberts: "Re: A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . ."