Re: anti-inbreeding laws
Lemonhead (karpiak@uiuc.edu)
Wed, 17 May 1995 13:49:43 -0500
On 17 May 1995, Evolution is both cultural and biological wrote:
> The most probable reason against inbreeding at the begining was
> due to that the more you marry outwards of a group the more area
> you can draw resources from. But at the same time the more alliances
> you have and the more allies you can draw from for aid.
>
> There is also a negative to this. The more you marry out the less
> you can accumulate resources unless you create specific mechanism for
> this. (Ex. Patriarchical descent groups)
>
But this implies cogantive processes at work, or at least a human
way of life (eg drawing on a large area for resources) But incest seems
to date back to at least our CA with chimps. Would the CA need a large
area to draw upon? Was it concerned with creating outward alliances (and
was it smart enough to know how to do this through marriage?)
--
yousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuck
you y suck
you Well, I used to get all o Kevin Karpiak suck
you fancy and stuff with my u University of Illinois suck
you .sigs, but now I'm just s at Champiagn-Urbana suck
you tired of doing that. u Student of Psychology suck
you So you're gonna have to c and Anthropology suck
you live with just this one k suck
you until maybe I get bored. yousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuck
you Or maybe, if you are a o suck
you really big loser you can u Reach me at: suck
you read my border becuase s karpiak@uiuc.edu suck
you it's pretty much true - u or suck
you You do suck. c lemonhead@bastard.org suck
you k suck
yousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuckyousuck
|