Re: Favorable Mutations?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Gil Hardwick: "Re: ZERO (was: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory""
• Previous message: Gil Hardwick: "Re: Harris"
• Maybe in reply to: geoffrey stephenson: "Favorable Mutations?"

In article <3or72p$h4i@news.cc.utah.edu>, geoffrey stephenson (gs1778@u.cc.utah.edu) writes:
>Your mission, should you choose to accept it: I am curious to know if
>anyone out there can give me an example of a mutation that is considered
>favorable or positive or in some way beneficial. I am not talking about a
>mutation that we think must have occurred millions of years ago. I want
>one that can be observed by we who are alive now. Thank you for your
>cooperation.

Wrong newsgroup entirely, old beano!

Discussion of genetic mutation belongs in sci.biology.

Maybe the boys in sci.anthropology.paleo might like to have it
x-posted into their little group.

• Next message: Gil Hardwick: "Re: ZERO (was: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory""
• Previous message: Gil Hardwick: "Re: Harris"
• Maybe in reply to: geoffrey stephenson: "Favorable Mutations?"