Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Keith Dever: "Re: Internet use for Anth/Arch (a suggestion)"
• Previous message: Triple Quadrophenic: "Re: If god exists, what created god?"

In article <Pine.SOL.3.91.950508180623.20875A-100000@jove.acs.unt.edu>,
Patti Rebecca King <prk0001@jove.acs.unt.edu> wrote:

>The Big Bang supposedly was the key to the formation of the
>universe
No actually it is how the universe got its start. There has been a great
deal of change since the time of the big band. These changes are brought
about by the interactions of the things created in the big bang.

>...so, since i assume humans werent here before the universe,
Humans were not around for almost all of the time since the big bang.

> it
>must have led to the formation of all life, including humans, and all
>processes, including evolution. As far as reproduction goes, the Big
>Bang is also the supposed origin of lots of things that cant reproduce
>themselves, systems of planets and stars and other matter, that are
>actually similar to the workings of the aforementioned watch...
Systems of stars and planets do not have gears and springs and dials. I
dont see and similarity beyond the circular motion. But even there there
is a problem. No parts in watches travel in ellipes. The universe is a
disorginized mess. We only happen to live on a chunck of rock that at
this time is following a near circular path around an average star.

-- 

--

kensmith@rahul.net   forging knowledge






 Next message: Keith Dever: "Re: Internet use for Anth/Arch (a suggestion)"
 Previous message: Triple Quadrophenic: "Re: If god exists, what created god?"