Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"
Patti Rebecca King (prk0001@jove.acs.unt.edu)
Sun, 7 May 1995 14:07:16 -0500
On Sat, 6 May 1995, Gil Hardwick wrote:
>
> In article <D7tBFH.Es4@crash.cts.com>, Robert Roosen (roosen@crash.cts.com) writes:
> >Julian Assange (proff@suburbia.apana.org.au) wrote:
> >: Zero cats are dogs.
> >: Zero protons are electrons.
> >
> >No cats are dogs.
> >No protons are electrons.
>
>
> Sorry, but you are both right off the planet on this one. Just because
> there no cats does not make them dogs.
>
> Just because there are no protons does not make them electrons.
>
> If there are no cats there are simply no cats. Likewise no protons.
>
> PERIOD!
>
> Please let's adhere to some passing sanity in our deployment of the
> language, shall we?
There arent any cats that are dogs..so "No cats are dogs."
does that help?
maybe i missed something here.....:)
-lc
>
>
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> He who refuses to qualify data is doomed to rant.
> +61 97 53 3270
>
>
|