Re: zoosexual cave art?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Per Lindqvist: "Re: If god exists, what created god?"
• Previous message: Eric Shook: "A: Was: "Evidence for Big Bang Theory," Now it is?"
• Maybe in reply to: Stephen Wray: "zoosexual cave art?"
• Next in thread: Stephen Wray: "Re: zoosexual cave art?"

In article <1739421E4.MBAUSER@kentvm.kent.edu> MBAUSER@kentvm.kent.edu (Michael Bauser) writes:
> Then I have to say, the archaelogists who find all the good cave-
> paintings are a lot more sedate than the archaeologists here in Ohio.
> The archaelogists I know could *never* keep something that odd to
> themselves. Just the words "pornographic cave art" are too funny
> not to say.

The whole idea that anthropologists would suppress taht acts of bestiality
were portrayed frequently in cave art seems to be the final application of
a Freudian point of view as applied to the "big picture."

It would be the same as saying that anthropologists are agents acting to
keep earth's sexual memories, from its cognitive infancy, suppressed!

-- Eric Nelson --
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee:
ENShook@Alpha1.csd.UWM.edu
Home:
Panopticon@Oubliette.com

• Next message: Per Lindqvist: "Re: If god exists, what created god?"
• Previous message: Eric Shook: "A: Was: "Evidence for Big Bang Theory," Now it is?"
• Maybe in reply to: Stephen Wray: "zoosexual cave art?"
• Next in thread: Stephen Wray: "Re: zoosexual cave art?"