|
Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"Eric Shook (Panopticon@oubliette.COM)Wed, 3 May 95 11:19:01 CST
In article <5kpMb8YEcsB@khms.westfalen.de> kai@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) writes:
> Well, this discussion won't fly unless we define what, exactly, we mean
So, let me get this straight: There are a lot of concepts flying around,
Here, let me help! ;) Nature, as a whole, does not fly around. God, on the
The truth is that the discussion hasn't evolved in a way that selects for
-- Eric Nelson --
|