|
|
Re: zoosexual cave art?
Michael Bauser (MBAUSER@kentvm.kent.edu)
Thu, 04 May 95 02:24:29 EDT
In article <STEVEW.95May3164132@debretts.comp.vuw.ac.nz>
stevew@debretts.comp.vuw.ac.nz (Stephen Wray) writes:
>I happened to have noticed a reference which claimed that such cave art was
>actually quite common, and that archaeologists are ("naturally") quite
>reluctant to discuss it.
Then I have to say, the archaelogists who find all the good cave-
paintings are a lot more sedate than the archaeologists here in Ohio.
The archaelogists I know could *never* keep something that odd to
themselves. Just the words "pornographic cave art" are too funny
not to say.
--
Michael Bauser <mbauser@kentvm.kent.edu>
"It's participant observation. Honest!"
|