|
|
Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"
Carl J Lydick (carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU)
28 Apr 1995 08:02:23 GMT
In article <528@landmark.iinet.net.au>, gil@landmark.iinet.net.au (Gil Hardwick) writes:
=
=In article <3njgj9$4f6r@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de>, Bruce D. Scott (bds@ipp-garching.mpg.de) writes:
=>Carl J Lydick (carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU) wrote:
=>
=>: The "tired light" hypothesis, so beloved of creationists, hasn't been in
=>: use by anybody except them since the 1950s or thereabouts.
=>
=>
=>Is David Crawford a creationist? (I don't know.)
=>
=>Crawford published his QGEL (quantum gravity e... losses) model in
=>D. F. Crawford Ap. J. 377 1 (August 1991) and D. F. Crawford AP. J. 410
=>488-492 (June 1993). Basically, it is a way for photons to lose energy to
= .
= .
= .
=
=Slipping just a tad behind the cutting edge here, are we Carl?
=
=Maybe you ought to put in a request to your boss to be paid for more
=than just knowing VAX/VMS, yes?
No, Gil. The hypothesis described above is quite distinct from the tired light
hypothesis. Once again, you demonstrate your abysmal ignorance.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl J Lydick | INTERnet: CARL@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU | NSI/HEPnet: SOL1::CARL
Disclaimer: Hey, I understand VAXen and VMS. That's what I get paid for. My
understanding of astronomy is purely at the amateur level (or below). So
unless what I'm saying is directly related to VAX/VMS, don't hold me or my
organization responsible for it. If it IS related to VAX/VMS, you can try to
hold me responsible for it, but my organization had nothing to do with it.
|