Re: On credulity and religion

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Mary Beth Williams: "Re: Bias"
• Previous message: Sisial@ix.netcom.com: "Re: What Matriarchy? (was Drugs etc.)"

In article <31ED2FA1.61FA@ix.netcom.com>, <Sisial@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>I'm really sorry. I took you for the person who initiated this subject.
>I personally find the whole thing to be humorous. [...]
>All I can ask is that you understand why I could not take the
>statements of someone who I thought had made the claim of 'conclusive
>evidence' seriously.

Um, I thought it was you who used the term "conclusive evidence." As in,
"what conclusive evidence is there against an afterlife." I'll pay
closer attention to bylines from now on. Sorry.

Bryant

• Next message: Mary Beth Williams: "Re: Bias"
• Previous message: Sisial@ix.netcom.com: "Re: What Matriarchy? (was Drugs etc.)"