Re: On credulity and religion

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Philip Deitiker: "Re: diseases and immunity"
• Previous message: Philip Deitiker: "Re: This used to be on disease and immunity"

!@?*$% wrote:
>
> > Yes, there are. I was stating my own criteria for judging. Care to do
> > the same, or is it easier to play the Sophist without any ground rules?
>
> Silly rabbit, that's the whole point.
>
> There are no ground rules until we choose them.
>

Could you please stop with the "silly rabbit"? It was old after the
first time.

Steve Barnard

(I know. "Silly rabbit ...")

• Next message: Philip Deitiker: "Re: diseases and immunity"
• Previous message: Philip Deitiker: "Re: This used to be on disease and immunity"