RI-602i Definition of Power

Koos Nolst Trenite (Koos.Trenite@trenite.de)
1 Jul 1996 21:35:30 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Anthony DiPaolo : "Re: New Egyptology Page - http://www.netcom.com/~tony19/egypt.html"
Previous message: josh: "The Perfect Ethnography lab - ?"
Next in thread: allan thompson: "Re: RI-602i Definition of Power"

20 June 1996

RI-602i 'Definition of Power'

from Ambassador for Mankind

Message # RI-602i for Internet

Being in, or creating, a position of Power
is
finding out or knowing or being informed
what people's different goals
and various desired activities are,
and
helping them and organizing them
so that they all can pursue
their various goals and
their different activities.

The more you are able to do this,
the more you are in Power.

The more you violate this principle,
the faster you will lose your Power, or
never achieve it in the first place.

An example of somebody who gained and maintains Power is
Chancellor Helmut Kohl of the Federal Republic of Germany,
as described in
RI-593i 'German Chancellor Helmut Kohl
on L. Ron Hubbard' of 11 June 1996.

Now, various people
have very thoroughly perverted
this very simple definition of Power.

It was perverted by L. Ron Hubbard,
who completely missed this definition,
because it only appeals
to a small part of this character
(and I did not manage to keep that part of this character
shining for very long).
L. Ron Hubbard defined "Power" as
"stay connected with your supporters", meaning
"don't stop them from contributing to you
and sending you presents".
His 'stay connected' was and is synonymous with
"be able to control as many people as possible".
And he added with his Policy
"The Responsibilities of Leaders" of 12 Feb 1967,
that one can lie and cheat, and, most of all,
that one must let one's supporters do as they please,
no matter how evil they are to people,
as long as they give support to oneself.
That is the whole "Power Formula"
written down - and also lived - by L. Ron Hubbard,
to the enormous detriment of himself, and
to the great sorrow of those people
who he - to some extent at least,
in the beginning, between 1945 and 1965 -
had some sane and correct Power over,
per my definition above.

I'll just repeat here
the correct definition of being in Power
in order to lift you out of those dark perversions of "Power"
and to brighten you up again:

All right,
this definition has been perverted and corrupted
in many ways with famous shortcuts to "Power".

But understanding this perversion
is ALSO a very very simple subject.

Understanding the perversion many people call "Power"
consists of
one simple word,
one simple concept,
and that is:
Betrayal!

The wife supports the husband
because the husband helps her to create a family.
Now the husband starts visiting and supporting
some other women
and thereby considerably diminishes his contribution
to his wife, to his children and family,
and this might go so far
as him being quite destructive to his wife and family.
But in order to stay in "Power", in his own family,
he hides this
and so he is betraying his wife and children and family,
and he also has to betray the other women he visits,
by making false promises to them or giving them false hopes.
And now he is in "Power"
of several women and some children.
He can determine to some extent what they can have,
and he can deny to them
some things or experiences they want to have.

He can control them to some extent,
and this he calls "Power",
but it IS just betrayal!
His Power depends on
the desire of his wife to contribute to him,
in return for his support of her desire
to create and enjoy a family-life with him.
He pretends to still do that, and so she still thinks
she is contributing to a sane family-life,
and that's how he stays in "Power".

And to brighten you up again,
I give you here the correct definition of Power:

And some people have figured out some shortcuts to this,
to getting in Power and being in Power
without doing the work for it,
and then they call THAT
"The Subject of Getting in Power and Staying in Power".

They describe to you - they in actuality define -
the subject of
earning money and enjoying possessions
as
the subject of
how to rob and steal successfully without getting caught.
And they write books about this, very successful books,
Machiavelli did, to name one.

Many historians write about the "great" people in history,
who were nothing more than
very insane and very evil robbers and murderers,
and were not great figures of history at all.

And then we have those people
who write books in order to make you believe
that these individuals, these robbers
are not Traitors, but are "in Power".

There is a particular genre or type of writers
who spend considerable efforts in their books
on making you NOT look at this betrayal,
and
who go to very great length
in making you FORGET about the correct definition of Power.

We have the very famous 16th Century writer Castiglione,
who wrote a book about how the honorable and noble rulers
are behaving at their Italian Renaissance Courts.

And he did a great job of NOT describing
what these Italian Renaissance rulers, like Isabella d'Este,
ACTUALLY did.

It is not unlike the Booklet recently published
about the "life" of L. Ron Hubbard,
published by his "Sea Org" slaves organization.

And not unlike this
Advisor (of German decent) to former American President Nixon,
- I don't remember his name at the moment -
on "Balance of Power",
meaning
that the world NEEDS to be governed
by at least two traitors
who have more or less the same amount of weapons
and
who are opposed and STAY opposed to each other.
That is HIS idea and recipe for World Peace:
Both should have an equal amount of atomic bombs
directed at each other,
and that should keep the surrounding smaller countries
free from being conquered by either of them.

How far can you go
in preventing others from seeing Treason?
The Russian people were betrayed,
and more and more Russian people found out
that they WERE being betrayed,
and therefore
more and more Russians in Russia stopped contributing to a
united - Russian dominated - Soviet Union.
And so
the "Power" of the Soviet Union, around 1990
suddenly became nothing.

The ACTUAL definition of Power
had been completely violated in the Soviet Union.

And to brighten you up,
I'll give you the actual definition of Power again:

All the other definitions of "Power"
are
shortcuts
which all involve and all are based on
betraying - in one way or the other -
the desire of people to contribute,
and are all intelligent and camouflaged betrayals
of the agreements made with people's desires
to contribute and get contribution in return.

So that you don't go and accuse me of
not writing and not giving you
the actual definition of Power,
I'll give it to you here again:

Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind

references:
RI-288i 'The Main Evil Purpose' of 15 Oct 1995
RI-543i 'Dictators' of 22 July 1994
RI-441i 'Edison versus L. Ron Hubbard' of 4 Jan 1996

RI-278i 'How Tyrant L. Ron Hubbard is "Right"' of 3 Oct 95
RI-278i-A'How Tyrant L. Ron Hubbard is more "Right"' 4 Oct 95
RI-279i 'How Tyrant L. Ron Hubbard Dominates Others' 4 Oct 95
RI-280i 'How Tyrant L. Ron Hubbard Thinks He Aids Survival' 5 Oct 95
RI-281i 'How LRH could make up for his tyranny (in Syracuse)' 7 Oct 95

RI-590i 'Selling Scn L. Ron Hubbard style, since 1966' 3 June 96
RI-589i 'ED INT - Drowning with LRH and his Sea Org' 2 June 96
RI-546i 'Support for the being LRH now is Treason...' 4 May 96
RI-536i 'A talk with Koos on L. Ron Hubbard's secrets' 12 Apr 96

RI-10i 'Confronting a Suppressive' of 12 Oct 1994
RI-53i 'Past Life Criminals and Scn Ethics' of 29 July 1994
RI-269i 'How to Handle Irresponsible People' of 26 Sept 1995
RI-444i 'The Practice of "SP-declares"' of 5 Jan 1996

RI-58i 'Fair Game Series - Treatment of Enemies' of 1 Jan 95
RI-487i 'Dialogue: On Enemies and Hostility' of 20 Feb 1996
RI-535i '"An Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend" = INSANE' 10 Apr 96

RI-514i 'Confessionals and Blackmail -...IMPORTANT' 16 Mar 96
RI-541i 'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - I' 20 Apr 96
RI-537i 'The Right to Demand Awareness' of 15 Apr 1996
RI-553i 'Decency and Honesty - Condition of Hiding' of 7 May 1996

RI-50RQi 'RI-xxxi series Archive - Content and Use' 28 Dec 94
Revised and Replaced on 6 March 1996

These and other RI-Bulletins can be obtained

(with WWW-browser) at
ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI
(with ftp) at
thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI

Next message: Anthony DiPaolo : "Re: New Egyptology Page - http://www.netcom.com/~tony19/egypt.html"
Previous message: josh: "The Perfect Ethnography lab - ?"
Next in thread: allan thompson: "Re: RI-602i Definition of Power"