Re: Human penises, was Re
Bryant (mycol1@unm.edu)
6 Jul 1995 12:42:31 -0600
In article <3tfod9$pvi@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>,
Mary Beth Williams <mbwillia@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Bryant wrote:
>>
>>Dr. Williams is apparently unaware that sociobiologists are working
>>within the adaptationist framework (i.e., she just contrasted
>>selectionism with selectionism, and found that selectionism looks good
Dr. Williams replied:
>Egads! I hope that you all can discern between sociobiololical and
>selectionist frameworks, as my conversations with Dave Rindos would
>lead me to believe that he draws few parallel between SB frameworks and
>his own (which I personally feel epitomize selectionism at it
>foremost...) I've forwarded on to him a few selections from this
>thread, and would ferverently argue that the views promoted in this
>thread are at odds with general *selectionist* thought, as proposed by
>Dunnell and Rindos...
Would that you would, Dr. Williams. Please do tell how adaptationism and
sociobiology are "at odds" with general selectionist evolutionary thought.
Thank you.
Bryant
|