Re: why apes but no apemen?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Susan S. Chin: "Re: why apes but no apemen?"
• Previous message: Michelle Malkin: "Re: What Are the Race Deniers Denying?"
• Maybe in reply to: daniel hwang: "why apes but no apemen?"
• Next in thread: Susan S. Chin: "Re: why apes but no apemen?"

dhwang@students.uiuc.edu (daniel hwang) wrote:

>one creationist argument against evolution is this,

>why do we have extent chimpanzees and gorillas but no
>specimens of the australopithecus, parantropus, or homo genus?

>any ideas?

Yeah. They died out when more advanced forms developed and either killed them,
developed better methods of hunting or intermingled with them. Didn't you ask
this same question last week?

Michelle Malkin

*************************************************************************
I cannot conceive otherwise than that He, the Infinite Father, expects
or requires no worship or praise from us, but that He is even infinitely
above it. (Benjamin Franklin, from "Articles of Belief And Acts of
Religion")
*************************************************************************

• Next message: Susan S. Chin: "Re: why apes but no apemen?"
• Previous message: Michelle Malkin: "Re: What Are the Race Deniers Denying?"
• Maybe in reply to: daniel hwang: "why apes but no apemen?"
• Next in thread: Susan S. Chin: "Re: why apes but no apemen?"