Re: BELL CURVE CRITIC EXPOSED?
Michael Andrew Turton (turtom@cortez.its.rpi.edu)
23 Jan 1995 16:09:20 GMT
In article <3fna0c$mek@chronicle.parcplace.com>, <tbev@parcplace.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Mike Turton wrote:
>> Did you read my other postings? I have read it -- 2x.
>
>WHICH postings are you referring to and HOW exactly do they undermine my
>claim that you inadvertently revealed you had NOT read THE BELL CURVE
>PRIOR to my BELL CURVE CRITIC EXPOSED? post?
Don't be an idiot. The statement on how the book is organized
is right there at the front of the book.
>
>> I was quoting M's description of it, not mine. I moved and temporarily
>> had my email suspended. Will get back next week hen I have more time on
>> the computer.
>
>Who is M?
>
>Take your time Mike, but I think you'll need to provide a detailed and
>compelling case based on posts preceding my BELL CURVE CRITIC EXPOSED? post
>if you want to regain your credibility on this issue.
>
>Regards,
>
>Tom Bevington
>
>
M is Murray. Have you read the book -- it seems you haven't,
otherwise you'd have recognized my statement was based on Murray's
statement right in the intro.
Getting back to TBC, Tom, perhaps you can provide a definitions of
"race" "intelligence" and other words Murray flings around. I'm still
waiting for anyone to try. I guess TBC's defender's have no idea what
"race" is.
Mike Turton
turtom@rpi.edu
|