Re: Effectual Demonstration at Rutgers (fwd)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: : "Re: Why 7 day week ?"
• Previous message: Greg Stevens: "Re: Sociobiology Debate"

In article <CMHolm-2302951021290001@147.24.138.5>,
CMHolm@va24669.hac.com (Carl Holmberg) wrote:
>
>Oh hell, he is free to say whatever he wants. When someone in a position
>to affect university policy, such as he, states and I paraphrase, "niggers
>are genetically too stupid to pass entrace exams", others are free to take
>offense and effect lawfull means to removed him from that position.

He was a true liberal who supported Affirmative Action programs
because he believed that African-Americans were "a disadvantaged
population that doesn't have that genetic hereditary background to
have a higher average."

I doubt that he is the only liberal that supports Affirmative
Action because they believe that African-Americans can't succeed
on their own without special help.

>
>If enough others eventually agree and he is removed, or not, that's the
>way office politics is played, baby. If you don't play, you may not even
>make janitor.
>
>If they DIDN'T act, then maybe the Prez would be proven correct, as the
>students would have show themselves too stupid to defend their own
>interests against such a blatant attack.

He was excusing himself for setting lower admissions standards for
African-Americans than whites. Rutgers should set the same
admission standards for all students.

I don't see why the Blacks are so mad at him, after all he was
trying to do the right thing for the blacks.

-- 

Rod Anderson  aka Mr. Nice Guy     o              o

rcanders@nyx.cs.du.edu           _/\-\__/*       \\__/\___

                                (*)    o        (*)     * o

                             Lightning P-38      DeFelice

• Next message: : "Re: Why 7 day week ?"
• Previous message: Greg Stevens: "Re: Sociobiology Debate"