Re: BELL CURVE CRITIC EXPOSED?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: David Waters: "Re: IQ AND RACE. The taboo subject."
• Previous message: Gerold Firl: "Re: mckenna,david abrahms,ethnologies"
• Maybe in reply to: Jim Rogers: "BELL CURVE CRITIC EXPOSED?"
• Next in thread: Martin Hutchison: "Re: BELL CURVE CRITIC EXPOSED?"

In article <1995Feb15.213553.1@ucsvax>,
Is it weird in here, or is it just me? <jdwren@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu> wrote:

> Genes are real. Genetic pools exist. Evolution did and does occur.
>Differences do exist between the races. Their importance, relevance and extent
>are all up for debate.

_Populations_ are real, but their boundaries are exceedingly fuzzy.
Their division into "races" is highly arbitrary. (If you don't think
so, try to make a comprehensive list of the "races", then go to the
library and look up all the other lists that have been compiled over
the years.)

-- 

Steve LaBonne *********************** (labonnes@csc.albany.edu)

"It can never be satisfied, the mind, never." - Wallace Stevens

• Next message: David Waters: "Re: IQ AND RACE. The taboo subject."
• Previous message: Gerold Firl: "Re: mckenna,david abrahms,ethnologies"
• Maybe in reply to: Jim Rogers: "BELL CURVE CRITIC EXPOSED?"
• Next in thread: Martin Hutchison: "Re: BELL CURVE CRITIC EXPOSED?"