Re: Effectual Demonstration at Rutgers (fwd)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Bearcat: "Re: BELL CURVE CRITIC EXPOSED?"
• Previous message: Mark S. Whorton: "Re: ANCESTRY QUESTION?"

In article <3ho5qt$c6j@gwis2.circ.gwu.edu>,
Elizabeth C King <eking@gwis2.circ.gwu.edu> wrote:
>In article <3ho0kt$3g9@starbase.neosoft.com>,
>Ted Krueger <krueger@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> wrote:
>>In article <3hisbu$j5o@pandora.sdsu.edu>,
>>Insomniac <elewis@ucssun1.sdsu.edu> wrote:
>
>>>Ruining a basketball game, OTOH, may not be nice to the fans, but
>>>basketball is not the primary goal of an institution of higher learning.
>
>>But ensuring that the president of the college speaks only politically
>>correct words, even in a closed meeting is the primary goal of an
>>institution of higher learning?
>
>Making sure the president of a college isn't a racist seems to be a
>pretty good thing. Unfortunately, one of the only ways to know if
>someone is racist is by the words they speak. Personally, from the
>little that I do know on this case, the president probably isn't racist.
>At least, I don't think that there is enough evidence to fire him. But,
>what if there were enough evidence?

Anyone who wants to fire someone at a univerity because of an idea, an
opinion, a study, or because they mis-spoke can not say they ever had an
eduation at a University.

>--
>---
>"Let there be songs to fill the air." GD
>
>Elizabeth
>eking@gwis2.circ.gwu.edu
>---

-- 

--

Steve La Joie

lajoie@eskimo.com






 Next message: Bearcat: "Re: BELL CURVE CRITIC EXPOSED?"
 Previous message: Mark S. Whorton: "Re: ANCESTRY QUESTION?"