Re: evolution / creation debates and netiquette
ifjed@nmsua.nmsu.edu
Sat, 4 Feb 1995 22:34:12 GMT
In article <Pine.SOL.3.91.950131211021.22383E-100000@jove.acs.unt.edu> Jerry Christopher Drake <jcd0002@jove.acs.unt.edu> writes:
>From: Jerry Christopher Drake <jcd0002@jove.acs.unt.edu>
>Subject: Re: evolution / creation debates and netiquette
>Date: Tue, 31 Jan 1995 21:10:54 -0600
>On Tue, 31 Jan 1995, Rod Hagen wrote:
>> There is a whole news conference specifically set up for evolution /
>> creation debates - talk.origins. Could people wanting to pursue such
>> matters please send their postings there without cross posts to this
>> conference? It only creates aggravation in sci.anthropology and alienates
>> the people you are trying to convince.
>>
>> (much the same could be said of "aquatic ape" discussion -
>> sci.anthropology.paleo is a better place to send it to - most of the
>> participants are more likely to read it there, including the principal
>> advocate of the theory - Elaine Morgan)
>>
>> Many thanks in anticipation
>>
>> --
>> Rod Hagen
>> rodhagen@netspace.net.au
>>
>>
>AMEN!
>Cheers,
>J.
You don't realize that it is the duty of Christians to make you listen to
them. They're are obeying a "higher" law. The best thing to do when
someone posts something that has nothing to do with anthropology as a
science is to quietly and politely refuse to participate in the discussion
(proper netiquette) or to enjoy reading about and/or ridiculing the "logic"
of creation (not proper netiquette, but sometimes fun).
|