|
|
Re: Evolution Conclusively Disproved
Carl J Lydick (carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU)
4 Feb 1995 06:05:48 GMT
In article <3gmjvc$nc2@quandong.itd.adelaide.edu.au>, dabbott@aelmg.adelaide.edu.au (Derek Abbott) writes:
=In article <D33oHF.Fo1@genie.slhs.udel.edu> berryh@genie.slhs.udel.edu (Dr. John Berryhill) writes:
=:In article <3g88cm$p66@rebecca.albany.edu> pn8886@csc.albany.edu (Phil Nicholls) writes:
=::In article <3g4f9s$md5@quandong.itd.adelaide.edu.au>,
=::Derek Abbott <dabbott@aelmg.adelaide.edu.au> wrote:
=:::
=::
=:::Here's conclusive evidence that evolution as we know it is incorrect:
=:::
=:::1) Pig meat is the closet to human meat
=::
=::In what way is human meat similar to pig meat?
=:
=:Ask a dermatologist. Pigs are often used to test wound treatment
=:techniques because their skin is the best animal model of human
=:skin.
=
=See I told y'all. Even more fuel for the fire.
Actually, if you ask a dermatologist, he'll tell you, among other things, pigs
are much cheaper lab animals than are chimps, and the animal-rights activists
don't make as big a fuss over them. Also, there's the fact that chimps are
much hairier than either animals or pigs, so in that sense, anyway, their skin
is a good animal model of human skin.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl J Lydick | INTERnet: CARL@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU | NSI/HEPnet: SOL1::CARL
Disclaimer: Hey, I understand VAXen and VMS. That's what I get paid for. My
understanding of astronomy is purely at the amateur level (or below). So
unless what I'm saying is directly related to VAX/VMS, don't hold me or my
organization responsible for it. If it IS related to VAX/VMS, you can try to
hold me responsible for it, but my organization had nothing to do with it.
|