Re: radcliffe-brown

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Susan S. Chin: "Re: Lucy's current status -- in the fossil record or out?"
• Previous message: Ethan Vishniac: "Re: Lucy's current status -- in the fossil record or out?"
• Maybe in reply to: servor@arrakis.es: "radcliffe-brown"
• Next in thread: Bterr: "Re: radcliffe-brown"

In article <32c3ead8.135445@news.arrakis.es>, <servor@arrakis.es> wrote:
>I am searching information about the methodology about radcliffe-brown

What's wrong with reading what he wrote? If you really want secondary
descriptions of structural functionalism try looking at some
history of anthropology works, or read some of the essay's in

Honigmann, John (editor)
1973 Handbook of Social and Cultural Anthropology,
New York: Rand McNally, 1,296 pgs.

rus

-- 

	_______________________________________________________________

	Rus Sheptak			Internet:	rus@world.std.com

	2679 Simas Ave.					rus@dnai.com

	Pinole, CA 94564				

• Next message: Susan S. Chin: "Re: Lucy's current status -- in the fossil record or out?"
• Previous message: Ethan Vishniac: "Re: Lucy's current status -- in the fossil record or out?"
• Maybe in reply to: servor@arrakis.es: "radcliffe-brown"
• Next in thread: Bterr: "Re: radcliffe-brown"