The Bell Curve (was: Suppression of Sociobiology)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Ed Conrad: "Re: ED CONRAD--THE NEXT STEP TO TAKE"
• Previous message: omar shafey: "Re: Suppression of Sociobiology"
• Next in thread: trevor rigler: "Re: The Bell Curve (was: Suppression of Sociobiology)"

omar shafey (shafey@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
: Sociobiology is alive, well and as dangerous as ever because it is used to
: mask social injustice by attributing social inequality to natural biology.
: Note the popularity of the _The Bell Curve_.

Speaking of _The Bell Curve_... :) I'm currently reading it, and I'm
wondering if anyone knows of any good critiques that they could recommend.

I'm not looking for 'political' criticisms so much as in-depth analyses of
the book's premises and logic. No polemics either way, please... And
thanks in advance.

Ted
edh@oitunix.oit.umass.edu

• Next message: Ed Conrad: "Re: ED CONRAD--THE NEXT STEP TO TAKE"
• Previous message: omar shafey: "Re: Suppression of Sociobiology"
• Next in thread: trevor rigler: "Re: The Bell Curve (was: Suppression of Sociobiology)"