Re: AUSTRALOIDS

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Bryant: "Re: Evolution, "adaptation", and what's currently adaptive"
• Previous message: Holly Reeser: "Re: Creationists win the schools in New Mexico"
• Maybe in reply to: E.G. Land: "AUSTRALOIDS"
• Next in thread: Philip Deitiker: "Re: AUSTRALOIDS"

In article <4vtli9$dat@news.smart.net>, bard@smarty.smart.net says...
>
>In article <32224361.486E@megafauna.com>,
>Stephen Barnard <steve@megafauna.com> wrote:
>>Eric Brunner wrote:
>>>
>>> Imagine instead written of Europeans:
>>>
>>> Recent researches have suggested that they may be the result of
>>> interbreeding between between an original population of "Homo
>>> neanderthalus" and the earliest members of "Homo sapiens."
>>>
>>> See any fur fly?
>>>
>>
>>I have read precisely this speculation (though not recently), and I
>>haven't seen any fur fly.
>>
>>The question of whether Australian Aborigines do or don't have a more
>>direct relationship to Homo erectus than other races is a matter of
>>fact, and it should have no political overtones. In particular, such a
>>claim -- right or wrong -- does not necessarily imply a value judgement.
>>
>> Steve Barnard
> I'm surprised no one has as yet taken the bull by the horns
> and addressed the question I asked.
>
> Did I word it wrong?
>
>

I don't know where, but I have seen the australoids refered to as homo sapiens
resens.
I don't know what the resens means. Anyone?

> EG Land
>
>--
>_______________________________________________________________________
>
>BARD (aka Ed Garth Land)
>Fly On-The-Wall, Inc.

• Next message: Bryant: "Re: Evolution, "adaptation", and what's currently adaptive"
• Previous message: Holly Reeser: "Re: Creationists win the schools in New Mexico"
• Maybe in reply to: E.G. Land: "AUSTRALOIDS"
• Next in thread: Philip Deitiker: "Re: AUSTRALOIDS"