Re: Patriarchy: Re: What Matriarchy?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Dan Grossman: "Re: listservs"
• Previous message: John Varela: "Re: how many bastards are there, anyway?"

Eric Brunner wrote:
>
> Stephen Barnard (steve@megafauna.com) wrote:
> : Eric Brunner wrote:
> : >
> : > : But an amusing crock. Though dancing naked around the fire invoking
> : > : the Gods to come down from heaven and bless the dancers is certainly
> : > : a lot more entertaining.
> : >
> : > : - Bill
> : >
> : > I'm sure he'll have an answer for this as well.
>
> : Yes, I will, and a pretty damn good one, too.
>
> ?

Already posted.

>
> : > Isn't it neat? All us
> : > Injuns getting all Oxonian and everything? Well, I'm going to leave the
> : > ain't-Injun-bait'n poster from NASA to his own devices, along with the
> : > rest of the sci.anth virulently-above-boarders, my spouse and I are now
> : > needing to center on something a bit more productive than educating the
> : > Napikwans.
> : >
>
> : Does this mean that I win the argument? :-)
>
> : Steve Barnard
>
> It does mean that there is a relation between two theorems, and that they
> are shown to be equivalent. That was your assertion, so the answer is of
> course "yes". I appologize for writing disparagingly of your mathematical
> acumen in previous posts.
>

No problem. Actually, I don't do very much original mathematics, but I like to
keep in touch with what's going on.

Ergodic theory is a very difficult and abstract field, so if you know your stuff
in it you're way ahead of me.

Steve Barnard

• Next message: Dan Grossman: "Re: listservs"
• Previous message: John Varela: "Re: how many bastards are there, anyway?"