Re: Patriarchy: Re: What Matriarchy?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: catherine yronwode: "Re: Intelligence on the X chromosome"
• Previous message: Paul Gorman: "Re: The Real Place of Fuzziness in Anthropology"

Stephen Barnard (steve@megafauna.com) wrote:
: Eric Brunner wrote:
: >
: > : But an amusing crock. Though dancing naked around the fire invoking
: > : the Gods to come down from heaven and bless the dancers is certainly
: > : a lot more entertaining.
: >
: > : - Bill
: >
: > I'm sure he'll have an answer for this as well.

: Yes, I will, and a pretty damn good one, too.

?

: > Isn't it neat? All us
: > Injuns getting all Oxonian and everything? Well, I'm going to leave the
: > ain't-Injun-bait'n poster from NASA to his own devices, along with the
: > rest of the sci.anth virulently-above-boarders, my spouse and I are now
: > needing to center on something a bit more productive than educating the
: > Napikwans.
: >

: Does this mean that I win the argument? :-)

: Steve Barnard

It does mean that there is a relation between two theorems, and that they
are shown to be equivalent. That was your assertion, so the answer is of
course "yes". I appologize for writing disparagingly of your mathematical
acumen in previous posts.

--

Kitakitamatsinohpowaw,

Eric Brunner

• Next message: catherine yronwode: "Re: Intelligence on the X chromosome"
• Previous message: Paul Gorman: "Re: The Real Place of Fuzziness in Anthropology"