Re: how many bastards are there, anyway?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Stephen Barnard: "Re: Amerind an offensive term (was: Early Amerind assimilation"
• Previous message: catherine yronwode: "Re: how many bastards are there, anyway?"
• Maybe in reply to: Lee Rudolph: "how many bastards are there, anyway?"
• Next in thread: Bryant: "Re: how many bastards are there, anyway?"

taibi@inil.com (Solomon Taibi) wrote:
>sfolse@odin.cair.du.edu (sgf) wrote:
>
>>Nevertheless, although the man's
>>sperm may battle it out, it may ultimately be the woman's internal
>>manipulation of sperm via orgasm during intercourse and subsequent
>>masturbation that most influences whose baby she will have.

So the man who gives the woman the most pleasure (or allows her to feel
relaxed enough to give herself pleasure) is the one who will reproduce.
That's interesting. It means that, it's not just the handsome men who
are selected for; it's also the ones with the most sexual skill.

This means that, as time goes by, men are going to be more and more
sexually skilled. (Assuming that there is a genetic component to sexual
skill.)

-- 


Matt Beckwith                        

http://users.southeast.net/~beckwith/

• Next message: Stephen Barnard: "Re: Amerind an offensive term (was: Early Amerind assimilation"
• Previous message: catherine yronwode: "Re: how many bastards are there, anyway?"
• Maybe in reply to: Lee Rudolph: "how many bastards are there, anyway?"
• Next in thread: Bryant: "Re: how many bastards are there, anyway?"