Re: The Real Place of Fuzziness in Anthropology

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: frank murray: "Re: Amerindian resistance mode (was: amerindian an offensive"
• Previous message: Haezl: "Re: Patriarchy: Re: What Matriarchy?"
• Maybe in reply to: Joel and Lynn Gazis-Sax: "The Real Place of Fuzziness in Anthropology"
• Next in thread: Paul Gorman: "Re: The Real Place of Fuzziness in Anthropology"

In article <3214D68F.3D54@best.com>,
Joel and Lynn Gazis-Sax <gazissax@best.com> wrote:
>
>Bryant, this is a fine example of what happens when I do try to "calm down".
>
>I did my best to cool my language. I did my best to stop the name-calling.
>But what do I get in return? "This is like trying to reason with a
>drunk, Joel. Can't be done."

Joel, that calm post followed the fetus-eating remark and included
reference to "my" mafia. It wasn't so calm.

I can handle the snyde remarks and flippancy as long as you don't freak
out when I offer some in return. I think we'd both rather discuss the
more substantive stuff in these threads.

Bryant

• Next message: frank murray: "Re: Amerindian resistance mode (was: amerindian an offensive"
• Previous message: Haezl: "Re: Patriarchy: Re: What Matriarchy?"
• Maybe in reply to: Joel and Lynn Gazis-Sax: "The Real Place of Fuzziness in Anthropology"
• Next in thread: Paul Gorman: "Re: The Real Place of Fuzziness in Anthropology"