Re: Patriarchy: Re: What Matriarchy?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Bryant: "Re: Patriarchy: Re: What Matriarchy?"
• Previous message: Matt Silberstein: "Re: Amerind an offensive term (was: Early Amerind assimilation"

In article <woody-0308962115130001@192.0.2.1>,
William Edward Woody <woody@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:

>In article <4u0cp0$1vgu@argo.unm.edu>, mycol1@unm.edu (Bryant) wrote:
>> Wrong. All of these are descriptions of the physical world. Newton's
>> observations about gravity may not be described mathematically by WaiWai
>> hunters, but they still exhibit caution around waterfalls.
>
>If you're not willing to listen to the answer, then don't ask the question.

This response seems illogical. I listened to the answer, and disagreed
with it. How does this make me "unwilling to listen" to her answer? --Bryant

• Next message: Bryant: "Re: Patriarchy: Re: What Matriarchy?"
• Previous message: Matt Silberstein: "Re: Amerind an offensive term (was: Early Amerind assimilation"