Re: Amerind an offensive term (was: Early Amerind assimilation

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: !@?*$%: "Re: Amerind an offensive term (was: Early Amerind assimilation"
• Previous message: Tom Zaranek: "Earliest evidence of fire question"

In article <31FFD01D.1BF9@byu.edu>, Shannon Adams <shannon_adams@byu.edu> wrote:

>Your definition of *native* seems a bit shakey. Is the requirement of an
>extinct first population part of your definition because that would
>explain why Native Americans (immigrants themselves) could be considered
>*native*. For that matter, could you honestly refer to Americans of
>European descent to be native Europeans when most of the European peoples
>immigrated themselves.
~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~

I guess we're all just native africans from at most 200kya. ;)

CRACKERS
(Going native from hell!!)

-- 


http://www.freenet.hamilton.on.ca/~ad329/Profile.html

   -=<Atari 2600 Collector and Wethifl Musician>=-

• Next message: !@?*$%: "Re: Amerind an offensive term (was: Early Amerind assimilation"
• Previous message: Tom Zaranek: "Earliest evidence of fire question"