Re: Amerind an offensive term (was: Early Amerind assimilation

The Outlaw (ccspgo@bath.ac.uk)
Wed, 31 Jul 1996 08:22:10 GMT

Mary Beth Williams wrote:
>
> In <31FDCDA0.5ABA@megafauna.com> Stephen Barnard <steve@megafauna.com>
> writes:
>

> >Native Americans? No. That's ambiguous and very slightly offensive
> >to me, since I'm a native (small n) American.
>
> Oh, you're offended by the truth? In the US, if you claim Native
> American status, you are making a claim to membership in a legally
> defined class of persons. So what is your tribal affiliation?
>

Oh come on, Mary. You know what he means. I never use 'Native American'
for precisely this reason. I am a native of the United States of America
and therefore a native American. I am not, and have no wish to create
antecedents to make myself, a 'N'ative American (your legally defined
classification of a group). This is what I believe Stephen was making
perfectly clear when he stressed the lower case 'n'. Of course in speech
the difference would be unclear so the term, consequently, unsuitable.

Paul


______________________________________________________________________
/ "As through this world you wander; Paul G. Overend \
| As through this world you roam, P.G.Overend@bath.ac.uk |
| You will never find an outlaw, http://www.bath.ac.uk/~ccspgo|
| Turn a family from its home." +44 1225 826074 |
\______________________________________________________________________/