Re: Life Duty and Death

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Chris Cracknell: "Barney created GOD???"
• Previous message: Carl J Lydick: "Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?"
• Maybe in reply to: dannie hawkins: "Life Duty and Death"

Woad809651 (woad809651@aol.com) wrote:
: This is something that is still majorly in contention. I wonder if the
: anthopological community will ever make up it's mind on this. So wouldn't
: this put Homo Habilis as the last hominid group of a different species.
: Something to think about, If we didn't interbreed, why are there still
: physical traits around today that are very common in Homo Sapeins
: Neandertalensis, but not Homo Sapiens? One question: does this newsgroup
: (sci.anthropology) cover aspects of cultural anthropology or is this just
: physical anthropology or both?
~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^

Personally I go with the subspecies theory myself (Homo sapien neaderthalis).
Interbreeding would certainly explain where I got my massive brow-ridge,
sloped forehead, and large nose from (In my physical anthropology classes
I can't help but feel that everyone in the class keeps looking at the
Neaderthal skull, then at me, then back at the skull, then back at me....).


CRACKERS
(Captain Caveman from hell!!!!!!!!!!!)

• Next message: Chris Cracknell: "Barney created GOD???"
• Previous message: Carl J Lydick: "Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?"
• Maybe in reply to: dannie hawkins: "Life Duty and Death"